Know what you’re looking at.

Crawlbird helps B2B SaaS teams examine how their brand appears in AI answers. Compare recommendations with competitors, investigate missed buyer questions and open the underlying answers and citations.

Founders, growth marketers and content teams who want a practical starting point for investigating AI visibility. Begin with questions your buyers ask when discovering or comparing products.

Yes. The example report and answer reader are available to explore without entering your website. Their fictional brands and illustrative results are clearly labelled.

Have your website, the competitors buyers compare you with and a short list of realistic buyer questions ready. Specific questions about use cases, integrations and buying decisions are more useful than a long list of vague prompts.

No. An answer can name your product without recommending it. Crawlbird distinguishes mentions from recommendations so a passing reference does not become an endorsement in your report.

In a benchmark report, discovery visibility is a recommendation rate weighted by the importance of non-branded buyer questions. Read it alongside the number of valid checks and the questions included in the sample.

No. Results describe the recorded checks for your chosen questions and collection method. Answers can vary by platform, model, time and context. A benchmark is evidence from a sample, not a census of every buyer conversation.

Crawlbird currently focuses on OpenAI/ChatGPT-related answer checks. The report methodology identifies how an answer was collected. API responses and consumer ChatGPT responses are different sources and should not be treated as interchangeable.

AI answers can vary between runs. Benchmark reports show valid checks and agreement where available, helping you distinguish a repeated pattern from a single response. Compare like-for-like questions and settings over time.

It shows a page referenced by an answer. Citation frequency helps you identify pages worth inspecting, but a citation alone does not prove that the page mentions your brand or caused a recommendation.

Yes. Open answer evidence to review the stored response and available citations. In the example answer reader, switch between checks to see how different responses affect the result.

The question results table supports search, filtering, sorting and CSV export. The report also offers a downloadable brief. Exports reflect the available report data.

No. The investigation workflow helps you review evidence and decide what to test. It does not automatically rewrite or publish your website content.

No. Recommendations are hypotheses based on observed gaps. Make a focused change, repeat comparable checks and assess the new evidence before drawing a conclusion.

The interface shows progress and unsuccessful checks rather than inventing results. Missing measurements should be read as unavailable, not as zero visibility.

The proposed launch plans are Starter at $19/month, Growth at $59/month and Studio at $149/month, in USD. These are plan previews: paid subscriptions and the planned allowances are not live yet.

No. It is a product demonstration using fictional brands and illustrative data. It does not start a subscription or represent results collected for your brand.

No. The pricing page shows planned capacity for future subscriptions. Collection frequency, run allowances, overage rules and final billing terms still need to be confirmed. The current demo does not activate these allowances.